Edward Ted Davis, professor of the history and philosophy of science and director of the Central Pennsylvania Forum for Religion and Science at Messiah College, lectured to close to 100 people on ...

Penn offers over 30 courses focused on evolution, and countless others cover the theory in some respect. What Penn does not offer, however, is a course exclusively covering intelligent design. As the ...

The presidents of Cornell and Princeton have publicly blasted intelligent design in recent months, while faculty at these universities, as well as at Brown, have been similarly outspoken in their ...

“Does the theory of ‘intelligent design’ deserve more support within academe? Should scientists be speaking out against this movement?” The answers to these questions in your online Colloquy are, ...

While some saw a federal ruling Tuesday as a major blow to the proponents of "intelligent design," a Seattle organization that is one of the movement's key figures slammed the decision as a futile ...

A movement which claims to be an alternative to the scientific theory of evolution is nothing than an attempt to inject politics and religion into the classroom, a University of Oklahoma professor ...

A Pennsylvania public school district will abandon its practice of teaching ``intelligent design'' before lessons on evolution after a federal judge ruled that the concept is ``the progeny of ...

SEATTLE — Alone among developed nations, America has not wholeheartedly embraced Darwinian evolution. Polls reveal that as many reject it as accept it, and this has been cited as proof of American ...

Re “Enlisting Science to Find the Fingerprints of a Creator,” March 25: The only difference between the “intelligent design” movement and “creation science” is the name. There is nothing scientific ...

Conclusions About Intelligent Design: Intelligent Design is fundamentally religious. This conclusion is based primarily on ID leaders' and their supporters' views of it as stated in their own words, ...

In the Nota Bene section of the December 12 issue (“Science and Spirituality,” The Chronicle Review), Evan R. Goldstein refers to intelligent design as “anti-rational and anti-intellectual” and lumps ...